BLOG

Steven Poole's picture

By Steven Poole

August 7, 2008

Loving, Hating Videogames

Earlier this year, The Guardian commissioned me to write a brief explainer on videogame violence in the wake of the Byron report. I felt no inclination to insist ‘Wahey! Videogames are all brilliant!’; I merely pointed out that the question of whether GTA IVis really more ‘violent’ than, say, No Country for Old Men has no obvious answer, and is anyway not really the most interesting point of comparison between them. Questions about what videogames are like as a whole are, arguably, increasingly in peril of being meaningless.

 

You can also forget about trying to interest me in anything with a cod-medieval setting, or that involves casting complicated spells, or requires me to adopt a fetish for the shiny arse-ends of licensed automobiles. I don’t like all videogames; I only like some of them.

And this, after all, is how it should be. Do you know anyone who likes books and likes all kinds of books, from popular exegeses of quantum mechanics to Mills & Boon romances? Do many people like all genres of film, or all genres of music? It’s very rare. We ought to consider it a tribute to the increasing breadth and maturity of the videogame medium that there are people who only play hyper-realistic FPSes, or games featuring talking fluffy animals. That is a natural segmentation as any medium progresses, from the initial fascination about all of it, just because this new thing is possible, to a stage where we take for granted that it is possible and develop certain preferences in style and content.

 

I once wrote in another context: “You say you love music? Well then, tell me which composers you hate.” I hereby confess: I hate a lot of videogames: they can be soul-destroying, artistically null, atrociously written exercises in mechanized futility. Some games – far fewer – can still renew my faith and wonder in the form’s potential. Even then, there are things I hate about the games I love, and that’s part of what I intend to spend future columns exploring. It’s one definition, at least, of what trigger-happy criticism ought to do.

aryshirazi's picture

wow - not sure what that geezer was on about that walls ice cream thing! but i think id just like to say ....... WORD!

i generally feel the same way... i hate most videogames... i only really like a few.... , i'm desperate for interactive animation on par with The Wire, or even something like Heroes (i use interactive animation there for a reason)... if you attach the word game on to something... it generally signifies this is going to be about winning or losing something and its going to be fun god damnit! ................ great ...... again?

Well, episodal is one route....

But where is gamings equivalent of the 2 hour film? .... id like to say Full Throttle.. & Grim Fandango.... classic story telling... but they're out dated and belong to a certain generation.

They've got the right idea... its kind of like a film production model... much like Quantic Dreams' Heavy Rain.

.. I guess its up to the new.. young blood generation of designers/artists out there who grew up alongside the medium in their living rooms.

Just be patient

littlewilly91's picture

alright, mebbe i shud vent my frustration at these times on walls instead. But it is a crap article isn't it? Rlly. Look at it. And Walls ice cream is going down hill too

senator_smack's picture

On the subject of usefulness your comments certainly don't warrant even the smallest entry. While I agree that first person shooters have had everything but depth and value these days, I certainly wouldn't call Mr. Poole's writing "disjointed," unlike the bile you spew. If you have nothing to say, don't talk.

gyak's picture

@ littlewilly91
As much as I felt entertained by your bilious words, just want to remind you that Mr Poole loves videogames - at least he loved them when he wrote one fo the most entertaining books on the topic - and this "love-hate" relationship brought some great columns to the table back in the day. (And yes I loved Mr Biffo's "pretentious ramblings" too.)

MikeL's picture

Mr Miles, did you not "wank" your Wii hard enough today? You seem to have a lot of pent up ... Wii tension left in you!

Try not to post when in that state, please! ;-)

littlewilly91's picture

Angry reader William Miles hates this article. But none of the others.

I'd never read a bad article in my edge magazine, until i read his. I gave it a chance despite my first impressions. It started with the the unoriginal and stupid tagline of ignorant murdering arseholes who think they are great everywhere- "shoot first, ask questions later". he doesn't offset it with anyhthing. That's just it. That's just dumb- Reading the distinctly average introduction where he tells us about his boring "relationship" with videogames didn't put the bad omens to rest. After wordcount assisting description of this thrilling relationship he tells us that he couldn't get a wii for a long time because he couldn't fit it in his small flat. apparently he would have broken everything by waving the wiimote around. but most Wii games can be played fine from the sofa. so that's a lie of a reason not to own a wii. And you still haven't written anything interesting...

so it continues. The sort of pre-emptive, basic feelings and concepts described at the start of other articles go on right to the end. It's just vague smug nothingness! He says nothing of any interest at great and tedious length. And he seems to think it's all a glorious revelation! - "Do many people like all genres of film, or all genres of music? It’s very rare." mmmm yes and so is anything of any importance to a gamer on this page!

He spends most of his time telling us that video games have different genres just like other mediums, and that people aren't going to like every genre. Come on now. That's a bollocks piece of subject matter. I'd be happy to hear why any one thinks otherwise. Really i would. But no matter how i look at it i can't see anything attall helpful in this article. His "hating video games" theme also boils down to absolutely nothing. it seems like he knows next to nothing about video games and is simply trying to voice his complaints toward the guardian. I mean has anyone at EDGE read this? What happened to quality control? Hurry up and fire this vomit inducing -insert derogatory swearword here- and hire Charlie Brooker! Now there's a man who's inspiring! Or anyone else! I don't care. Plz get rid of him! He's crap

There is a line i like though- "I hate a lot of videogames: they can be soul-destroying, artistically null, atrociously written exercises in mechanized futility". PHWOAR! That's nice writing. Indeed, It feels good to know these criticisms even exist after playing hideously dull and derivative FPSes. It can feel like the world is descending into soulless capitalistic brainless mechanized futility after playing those games.
So congratulations on that Steve, but the rest of the paragraph is so disjointed and dumb that on the whole it reinforces this feeling.

gyak's picture

"and that’s part of what I intend to spend future columns exploring"

Does that mean we'll see brand new "Trigger-happy" EDGE columns in the future? /wink, wink