FEATURE

Exclusives Analysis: Xbox 360

Kris Graft's picture

By Kris Graft

March 25, 2009

See also:

Related Articles:

“If we ever said we have enough exclusive franchises on our platform, we would just be naïve.”

Also read Edge's Sony interview, Exclusives Analysis: PS3, and stay tuned for our interview with Nintendo's Denise Kaigler early next week.

-------------------------------------------------------


For 2009, Microsoft is playing coy, perhaps a bit more than usual. The company has confirmed very few exclusive Xbox 360 games for 2009, presumably holding tight for high-profile game events such as E3 or this week’s GDC for big game reveals.


Sony, on the other hand, has been touting its 2009 first-party lineup from its large stable of internal studios for a few months. Microsoft has only announced exclusives like Halo 3: ODST and the mainstream online game 1 vs. 100. Alan Wake is still under development at external developer Remedy, and the first-party Forza Motorsport 3 is all but official—Microsoft still files the racer in the “rumor and speculation” category.

But keep in mind that the biggest Xbox 360-only game of 2008 was November’s Gears of War 2, which was officially announced only months prior to release at February 2008’s Game Developers Conference. Something more is cooking at Microsoft for 2009.

“For me, I want to know the game I’m talking about when I’m talking to customers. I’m not going to announce a game with a billboard and say, ‘Here’s a game.’ I don’t like doing that,” says Phil Spencer, general manager at Microsoft Game Studios. “I want to understand what we’re shooting for. … I think people will begin to see a very strong lineup across platform and content for us.”

Microsoft’s exclusive lineup for 2009 started with what would be the swan song for former internal developer Ensemble Studios: Halo Wars. Microsoft announced last year that the studio, which created the Age of Empires series, would shutter. Subsequently, the real-time strategy console game went on to break 1 million units sold in less than a month, a fitting finale for the respected developer.

While not a full game, Microsoft claims to have hit an Xbox Live download record with the release of Rockstar Games’ $20 Grand Theft Auto IV add-on The Lost and Damned, the first of two exclusive expansions that come from a special partnership between Microsoft and the developer. Microsoft reportedly paid a $50 million advance to Rockstar to seal the exclusive deal.

It’s those kind of big exclusive partnerships with external developers that Microsoft has been increasingly reliant upon. With the axing of Ensemble, Shadowrun developer FASA and the spin-off of Halo house Bungie into an independent, Microsoft is left with relatively few internal studios to create exclusive games. But the studios that remain are full of talent, and capable of developing hit franchises. There’s U.K.-based Lionhead, which released the critical and commercial hit Fable II last year; Rare, which is behind the Perfect Dark series and recently released Banjo Kazooie: Nuts and Bolts; Forza Motorsport house Turn 10; Wingnut Interactive, which is actually a partnership between Lord of the Rings film director Peter Jackson and Microsoft; and Xbox Live Productions, which specializes in games for Microsoft’s online service.

Spencer claims that dropping internal studios ensures that Microsoft is placing dollars in areas of growth and innovation. “It’s not like we’re not doing this to somehow build … franchises more cheaply, it is about making sure that we have the right resources in the right places to bring on innovation that we think defines our future.”

Sony, on the other hand, has about three times as many internal studios developing games exclusively for PlayStation platforms. But by brokering exclusive publishing deals with external developers, Microsoft (which ironically is a company founded on software development) has been able to effectively compensate for its relative lack of internal game studios. The company still has very close ties with Bungie and Gears of War developer Epic Games, as well as iNiS, the respected Japanese music studio behind the karaoke game Lips, which headlined Xbox 360’s mass market push.

But don’t call those external developers “third-“ or “second-party.”

“I know it’s kind of industry terminology, but we view all of the games that MGS publishes as first-party games, regardless of whether it’s Epic, Ensemble, Turn 10 or Bungie,” says Spencer. “If a game comes out with our logo on the box, it’s a game that we feel like we’re completely committed to.”

For Spencer, the business has less to do with who has the most internally-developed games. Having an exclusive deal with an external developer brings about the same results. “It’s about working with the best talent in the industry, and not necessarily the structure of how you work together. Our work with Epic, as an example, feels no different to us than our work with Turn 10, which is a studio that we own, doing some game—some racing game.

“It is about us finding the best talent in the industry, building a working relationship that we think delivers the best content, and that strategy has been successful for us. There’s no preordained number of studios that we have to own or not own at any time. It’s about the portfolio that we have.

“There’s no formula running in Excel that says how many people we have to have who are badged ‘employees’ versus ‘partners.’”

By any means, Microsoft knows that exclusives are important pieces of the puzzle in today’s console business. “If we ever said we have enough exclusive franchises on our platform, we would just be naïve.”

Top_Dollar's picture

First look at Final Fantasy XIII on the 360:

LOL

Anonymous's picture

Ozzman is 100% correct!!!

I think a game called "Halo Kart" would be awesome!

Halo Kart or "Gears of Kart Racing" would be AWESOME!!!

I am being 100% serious when I say that I would LOVE to see games involving Halo and Gears of War in environments like Karts, or Legos...Those would make GREAT Xbox Live Arcade games!

Ozzman_79's picture

Oh Kim_Naroz, how you flatter me so.

NickgamertagO1's picture

Wow, Kim is taking it up a notch. I think he's embracing his obvious employement knowing all too well that the jig is up and now he's just going crazy. There's no way he really thinks Halo or Gears should be turned into a Kart racing series. He's just getting carried away now. Kim, why not just take it to the next level and flat out admit you're a spammer, you know you're going to get kicked again anyway.

MarkJFerreri's picture

When I hear of solid exciting titles coming out for the 360, I get a full deposit pre-order down as soon as possible. Last August, there was a time when I had 7 pre-orders waiting to hatch. I picked the last of those up last week. There are no new 'AAA' titles coming for the 360 in the near futur. I hope that there are titles hiding beneath the deskmats of the Microsoft PR teams. Last year was an exciting time for 360 gamers and I waited for each of my games as though their appearance was Christmas morning.

To me, the source of development is not a consideration. Regardless of whether a game is 1st, 2nd, or 3rd party, regardless of whether it's from a large company, and regardless of how many other consoles they are creating the game for has little value. To me, it's graphics, sound, playability, re-playability, hours to completion, and online support that are all contributing factors.

And if the same game is ported to multiple systems (including the PC) more power to the software developers, provided their game is a winner. I surely hope that my excitment is re-invigorated with this years announcements for the 360.

All Gaming is Good Gaming!

Mark....................................................................................................................................

Ozzman_79's picture

"Halo Kart"? Pure gold!

Chotus's picture

Yeah that "Halo Kart" comment was funny as he##

BritishCracker's picture

the only problem MS had was that they rushed at bringing the 360 out to quick. im lucky that my 360 has only broke once! & ive had it since it was released! Cant wait for the 720!

VivaLaJam's picture

I still have my launch console and have had no problems with it. But I know the moment that the RROD warranty goes out of date It will die.

NickgamertagO1's picture

Nice avatar.

"But I know the moment that the RROD warranty goes out of date It will die."

That's why I traded up my Elite for an acade (kept the 120gig HDD). Got the jasper arcade unit so I've not only reduced my chances of RROD substantially, have a quiter system, have a new lease on life for 3 years, I'm also doing my part for the environment as the jasper uses less watts and amps.

Chotus's picture

Me too. I bought the original Elite and havent had one problem with it so far. I'm keeping my fingers crossed it will stay that way.

BritishCracker's picture

What ever you do DONT get the intercooler fan! it does feck all lmao!
i made the mistake of buying one & it borke within 2month :(

jazzbrownie's picture

Where's Mattrick? I want to hear more from that guy ; )

He was fun... like my friend who is on cocaine.

I'm being totally serious, btw.

*edit*

I'm just kind of annoyed with Microsoft's only talent being able to buy people who have it.

manhattan's picture

There's a lot of intelligent people posting here-- sometimes, a lot more intelligent than I give them credit for. But I just don't see how anyone here can take seriously the things that this bonehead say:

“For me, I want to know the game I’m talking about when I’m talking to customers. I’m not going to announce a game with a billboard and say, ‘Here’s a game.’ I don’t like doing that,”

"..... Turn 10, which is a studio that we own, doing some game—some racing game."--(LOL)

"We view all of the games that MGS publishes as first-party games, regardless of whether it’s Epic, Ensemble, Turn 10 or Bungie. If a game comes out with our logo on the box, it’s a game that we feel like we’re completely committed to.”

MI6009's picture

I've met Phil before and my impression of him is far from being a bonehead. Sure, he doesn't have the marketing speech down pat, but would you rather have someone saying plain old crap or actually try and say something? I'm sure everyone knows what Turn 10 is working on next, but they haven't announced it yet and he is toeing the company line. Phil has my respect... Having gone through 3 360s I can't say the same on the hardware side of things, but the software side has proven itself.

Chotus's picture

You know I really don't care what their Corporate Mouth Pieces say. As long as they bring the good games I don't care where they came from. It doesn't make it more or less fun if it's a first party, 3rd party, bought exclusive...etc.etc

All 3 companies have their corporate mouth pieces spewing different cra# to make it sound like they know it all.......just business as usual. The all want to sway opinion their way for more sales. simple as that.

but like I said.........long as the games are good, I don't care what they say.

nobodyspeshul's picture

Well, the universal trait of marketing people is to talk much and say nothing. It's in the nature of capitalism. I don't think what this guy says is any worse than occassional self-indulgent ravings coming from Sony's camp. :-)

Chotus's picture

"Well, the universal trait of marketing people is to talk much and say nothing. It's in the nature of capitalism. I don't think what this guy says is any worse than occassional self-indulgent ravings coming from Sony's camp. :-)"

Agreed! All 3 platform holders do it. Just business

ztrapwn's picture

Hopefully we can see more big title shared between the PS3 and the 360. It wouldn't make Sony or Microsoft happy, but it certainly would increase the revenues of certain companies -- and that's highly beneficial for consumers.

manhattan's picture

It's Microsoft's laziness to create and develop something on their own and their contentment to just buy anything that looks lucrative is the thing that pisses me off most. The day that Microsoft dominates the entire tech industry is the day that technological progress dies.

Chotus's picture

"It's Microsoft's laziness to create and develop something on their own and their contentment to just buy anything that looks lucrative is the thing that pisses me off most. The day that Microsoft dominates the entire tech industry is the day that technological progress dies."

Serioiusly.....why does that piss you off??? That doesn't make games less fun cuz they didn't create them inhouse. Games are either good or they are not. Not matter who created them.

Platform holders will always try and score good games one way or the other. there are no saints in the videogame business.

NickgamertagO1's picture

Don't let Deez (manhattan) get to you, it's just in his nature to hate MS. He's the bizarro Kim (ok, not fair, he's not that bad).

manhattan's picture

Microsoft doesn't push technology forward, it's the people that they hire and pay who do. I have nothing but admiration for Bungie, Ensemble, Epic Games and all the other developers who produce cracking titles for the 360. Try a Microsoft-only developed product and you'll know what I mean.

ssump29's picture

And here is where your thinking is incorrect. It doesn't matter if MS is paying for the push forward or doing it themselves. Most those companies you listed wouldn't even be able to push forward if they didn't have MS behind them. The real situation is the brains are there for the little people but if you don't have the cash to get your thoughts and ideas out they won't help push anything forward. And thats when MS steps in and provides the funds. So in essence they are involved in the push forward because if they weren't paying you wouldn't even know what those companies would be capable of. All great inventions have had big time backers behind them. MR Ford wouldn't never have moved America forward with the automobile if he didn't have big businesses producing the funds. Same with MS, they have a talent at finding the talent when no one else see's the talent. They take big risk and reap big rewards. Its been going on since the beginning of time, MS ain't doing anything that hasn't been done before. SO just get over it and be happy they are willing to produce the cash to bring these people's vision to life.

NickgamertagO1's picture

Yeah you're right Deez, MS's internal developement made Halo and that didn't do anything for MS or gaming in general. It hasn't become a huge gaming icon and gone on to sell millions of games/consoles. (Yes I'm aware Bungie made it, but at the time Bungie was an in-house dev team falling in line with your points you've been making about 3rd parties making games for Xbox and not in-house dev teams).

Chotus's picture

I hear the point you are making. That just really doesnt bother me much. As long as Microsoft either through themselves or 3rd party can get the good games out......I'm a happy man.

SaintJude's picture

Yawn.

lifeat30fps's picture

I am very glad MS knows that just stealing a Nintendo concept is a very bad idea. It's too bad they didn't realize it before the whole Mii theft thing. It is interesting that they consider a game developed and made by another company that they market as *their* game. Kind of how I think Neil Gaiman's books are *mine* since I get all my friends to buy them.

I think MS is playing their cards close to the vest. I am positive they will have a AAA title for the holiday season. Honestly, even if they didn't, they would still be ahead of Sony come Jan 1, 2010.

Brian
www.brianwoods.com

SaintJude's picture

Microsoft seem genuinely and quietly confident about this year. I wonder if they actually have a few tricks up their sleeve or whether it's just hot air. Somehow I get the feeling they will spring a massive surprise come the trade shows...

Chotus's picture

I hope so...........and hopefully something unique

squazzil4's picture

ok, Perfect Dark 2 is the most intriguing IMO. The game will have to be STUNNING or the fans will turn rabid and finally reject Rare. PD Zero still has glimpses of brilliance but was clearly unfinished. They also had Peter Moore putting the boot in a lot. Thats not how u make a great game. I dont remember Miyamoto turning up at the Rare barn with a stick. What MS should do is send Rare an email saying; "Ok please try and get the game out for Christmas. We'll leave u alone so just go about ur business and try for the 10/10. Here is some cider for u while u make the game."

Then you might get a 10/10. Not some Peter Moore rrod abuse project.

SaintJude's picture

The wait for a Goldeneye sequel was so damn hard for me. I used to love those guys at Rare. Perfect Dark (N64) was pretty damn good and with a multiplayer that was head and shoulder above anything else around at the time. I'm not entirely sure what happened to them since then. I don't think it is the Microsoft influence because MS can hardly be a more pain-in-the-ass master than Nintendo was. They just seem to have lost their edge.

Dan_Chippendale's picture

360's exclusive line-up is looking a bit lackluster in comparison to PS3's.

Chotus's picture

So far yes. Sony has gotten off to a good start with Killzone 2. I'm having a good time going between that and Gears of War 2. Both great games.

Hopefully Microsort is holding back some good stuff........time will tell

tirminyl's picture

Lips 2 and You're In The TV Show

NickgamertagO1's picture

lol

bluemanrule's picture

It's March. Microsoft has not unveiled its release schedule for 2009. Give it time. You're calling the game in the first quarter. Give it time. Microsoft has spoken with uber-confidence and I'm expecting them to have a couple of blockbuster releases this year.

Although I don't own a PS3, I am very excited about some of the games this year. I also can't wait to see what Team ICO has planned.

Chotus's picture

If you can pick up a PS3 I highly recomment it. It's nice having both...never miss out that way.

Tony-Wicks's picture

Exclusive price cut # 13 iminent?