UK politicians are more likely to condemn violent videogame content than stand up for the industry, says Ed Vaizey, UK Shadow Cabinet Minister for Culture.
MP Vaizey speaks to Edge following reports that the UK Government has failed to limit Canada's generous subsidy policies for game companies.
Back in March, the Department for Culture spoke on the ‘unfair’ level of tax breaks which Canadian developers currently enjoy. The Department stated that such attractive benefits overseas are drawing developers and publishers out of Britain, and promised to consult the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in an attempt to limit foreign subsidies.
“The Government pretended that this was a viable option,” says Vaizey, “but really, it was an excuse not to take action. There was never any chance of the Government getting anywhere with this referral. The WTO does not have the power to intervene on subsidies.”
On Tuesday Richard Wilson, CEO of UK games industry group Tiga, made a similar assessment, adding that the Labour Government needs to think about improving its own nation’s subsidy policies rather than seeking to limiting those elsewhere.
Vaizey agrees. When asked by Edge if tax breaks would be a more practical step in rejuvenating the UK games industry, he said: “Quite possibly. We have a film tax credit, and R&D tax credits. If we were to, say, extend the film tax credit to video games, we would probably need EU approval, but the Government should have been exploring this. France already has its system in place.”
“It need not have an impact on public spending,” he adds. “I understand the film tax credit has cost less than half the amount budgeted.”
The Government’s failure to restrict ‘anticompetitive’ foreign subsidies couldn’t have come at a more telling time. The UK has just become the second biggest videogame market in the world, following an annual software sales surge of 26 percent in 2008.
But though the money is flowing at the retailers, Britain’s game development sector is at risk of dropping to fifth in the global rankings.
“It’s clear that action is needed,” says Vaizey. “We already know games companies are relocating to Canada; the evidence is there for all to see. This is a 21st century industry, where Britain is a world leader, and where there is the prospect for huge growth in the jobs market, especially as the game market grows. Canada recognises this, Britain does not.”
Subsidies have prevented a "worldwide free market economy" ever becoming a reality.
It'd be nice to see if Canada would be such a popular hang-out for developers if they were told they'd had to drop their subsidies.
The UK government has broken the UK with its complete inability to notice new trends and growing industries (especially electronics/technology/software) and supporting them. It took the easy option and gave its encouragement to a crooked financial sector.
Mega-AAA titles are becoming just a fantasy now. UK companies should be try to make more, cheaper and smaller titles, rather than putting all their eggs in a single AAA basket. Also, try create new models of sales that just go beyond clawing all the money back within a week of title going on sale. Publishers are just greedy middle men and distribution systems like Steam have more potential.
I'd like to see some new straight-to-budget retail labels, like we had in the 80s-90s.
Why pick out the games that are violent?
The government is so... generalistic that all games are violent...
The economy will fail some more if the gaming industry leaves it being one of thr strong points in the economy.
Hope they show their sons and daughters the verdict. Happy, happy kids, without their favourite console. Hoo-rah.
In other words, they're unlikely to do anything more than fund a bunch of politicians and (literally) related pen-pushers to do nothing much more useful than sit in a nice office in London wondering why Space Invaders needs money. Cheers.
I think that's unfair, that's a very anachronistic view of the tory party and labour are clearly failing on this issue (as well as other issues.)
I'm sorry, allow me to clarify.
There are no actual solutions for the industry being offered by any of the political parties. Just words. However, I stand by my comment. All the Conservative chap seems to be saying is that, at best, more paid work will go the way of some pointless quango. I was not being anti-Tory and pro-Labour (though you clearly take an opposite stance). Until one political party grows a pair and steps forward with a firm offer of assistance to our industry (and others), I happily paint them all with the same beige brush.