News

California Game Law Back on Table

Sen. Leland Yee's law to limit sales of violent games reconsidered.

On Wednesday, California will be appealing a 2007 court ruling that found proposed restrictions on the sales of violent videogames unconstitutional.

The bill, drafted by Sen. Leland Yee when he was an assembly member in 2005, would put restrictions on the sales of mature-themed videogames to minors.

"This is the same technology the armed forces use to help soldiers kill the enemy," Yee, a Democrat stated in a San Jose Mercury News report. "All we're saying is, 'Don't sell it to kids.'"

Courts have yet to recognize any studies that link virtual violence to real world violence, a stance which has been a thorn in the side of game legislators.

Similar laws in various states have been found by courts to infringe on First Amendment rights of game makers.

Leland's law would require a 2" x 2" government-issued label displaying the number "18" on the front of mature-rated games, and retailers would have to check IDs when making a sale. Violators would be charged up to $1,000 per incident.

The games industry has prided itself on self-regulation, using Entertainment Software Rating Board scores and descriptors as a way to alert parents of mature-themed content.

But Deputy Attorney General and rep for Schwarzenegger's administration Zackery Morazzini argued, "It defies logic to suggest that our founding fathers intended to adopt a First Amendment that would guarantee children the right to purchase a videogame wherein the player is rewarded for interactively causing a character to take out a shovel and bash the head of an image of a human being."