NEWS

Furor Over 9/11 "Invaders!" Game Art

Kris Graft's picture

By Kris Graft

August 22, 2008

See also:

Related Articles:

"I think there’s some confusion in there, as per usual."

Artist Douglas Edric Stanley says his Space Invaders-inspired take on the 9/11 attack is social commentary, but the game's creators are calling it infringement. (Update: Stanley has since pulled the exhibit.)

A rep for game developer Taito told Kotaku on Friday, "Taito is seriously considering all available options—including legal actions against the infringer and, if necessary, the Games Convention exhibitor involved—in order to end this unauthorized and impermissible misuse of the Space Invaders content and to protect Taito's intellectual properties."

At the Games Convention in Leipzig, Germany, Stanley is exhibiting Invaders!, a game in which aliens descend upon the World Trade Center, which inevitably falls no matter how the game is played. Building occupants jump from the skyscrapers during the course of play.

Taito didn't comment on the subject matter of the game itself.

Something as provocative as Invaders! is intended to prompt discussion, and gamers are talking. Invaders! is eliciting different emotions from gamers across the Internet, with many taking Stanley's work to task, saying the piece trivializes the tragedy. Others have accused him of cheap attention-grabbing tactics.

On Stanley's personal blog, he said Kotaku and its readers have "had a very negative reaction" to the work, noting that the site's "community seems pretty pissed off."

To that, Stanley said, "I think there’s some confusion in there, as per usual."

Commenters attacked Stanley on his own blog, with some suggesting that he participate in performance art that involves shoving the Eiffel Tower into a certain part of the French-American artist's anatomy.

The New York Daily News quoted relatives of 9/11 victims, who called the work "disgusting." Stanley also replied to that, saying dialing up relatives in such a manner is "just as sleezy and facile as anything else I’m apparently being accused of."

In a Twitter message yesterday, he called the situation an "overblown brouhaha."

A press statement announcing the art exhibit, which originally debuted in 2001, stated:

"The World Trade Center attacks mark a deep cut in our recent history that is still being processed. The French-American artist Douglas Edric Stanley has found an unusual – though obvious – metaphor with his work Invaders!, which is based on the 1978 arcade original. In his interactive large installation, the players must prevent the catastrophe by controlling the well- known cannon at the lower screen border with their bodies and firing it using arm movements. Like the original, this trial is ultimately unsuccessful, thus creating an articulated and critical commentary about the current war strategy. In this regard, Douglas Edric Stanley sees Space Invaders as 'a social tale that can be related to historical tales without losing its poetic power.'"

Leipzig GC had yet to return requests for comment.

Image courtesy Kotaku.

AaronMC's picture

I support the guy.

It doesn't matter whether he's grandstanding or not. Grabbing headlines? Don't care.

It's freedom of speech. I'll support him, an epithet-lobbing neo-Nazi, or a peace-loving hippy.

If you're insulted, fine. Say so and move on. This furor is inane.

8Bit_Hero's picture

Shouldn't this be protected as satire? The only thing that Taito can prosecute him for is trying to sell it. As for it being offencive, maybe its just because I'm Canadian, but this doesn't seem like a huge deal, more of a biting satire of American xenophobia and the inevitability of the events that conspired on that fateful day than. While it may still be too soon for this piece to be widely accepted, the flak that the artist has garnered is largely undeserved as he is simply exercising his first amendment rights. This is just over-reaction bulls***.

rabbitc's picture

two words: insensitive crap

editor's picture

The sad fact is that artists such as this try to boost their credibility by high claims of value. But when they are faced with the reality of theft of a international IP and the possibility of legal action from Taito they run a mile - while claiming it is the fault of others why they pulled their work!

What sickens me is the way that the GC has buried its head in the sand and avoids commenting. Even the Berlin museum has cast the artist adrift - funny how your friends vanish when your work is found out!

Hidden under the table in all the commentary is the fact that both the artist and GC had duped copies of his 'game' to sell at the show, only to be pulled when the legal action was dangled in their face.

And no one mentions how much the artist was paid for this 'installation'! Will he be paying it back?

German's picture

Point taken, but thanks to people like this guy it wont happen anytime soon. He is using a video game for his goal and using one that is not even his own creation. People around the world will hear about this insensitive video game and thus will keep video games in a negative light. I agree that the mass media is a lost cause when it comes to portraying video games but its so much annoying when people like this guy gives them more reasons to do just that.

cronotrigger913's picture

I can understand that sentiment.

For me, I truly feel as if this problem is occurring based on people's perception of video games in general, which is perpetuated through the media. Most people assume games are some kid-based entertainment, created to be some quick diversion, with no real sense of meaning. And that's not true. Meaning is what's being portrayed in this artistic expression, where the idea of not being able to truly win is portrayed and set against a contemporary, highly emotional back drop. Inevitably, people are going to see this as some glorification of the events, which is completely false. If people think games are simply to have fun and to divert our eyes from reality, then most people will not get his message, or even take the time to think about it. Add that mental inability for video game appreciation to the brain-dead mass media, and the results of what happen will always happen. And that's sad, as the piece worked out really well.

The legality of the situation is definitely against the guy, but whatever, he did a good job and met his goal of evoking an emotional response.

And I don't even know if that related to your response, but it sure turned out better than I was expecting:)

cronotrigger913's picture

When saying there's nothing more to say on the subject, I meant that in reference to how mass media portrays video games. IE, poorly. Not the idea of war and tragedy.

cronotrigger913's picture

I am probably one of the few that didn't find it that upsetting. And I really object to that NY Daily article. That's just bullshit mainstream media up to its old tricks. There's nothing more to say on that subject that hasn't already been said. Outlets like that have always been that stupid, and it's sad to see it happen every time.

To me, the usage of both Space Invaders and the WTC event worked as an artistic expression, and I do not include myself with the ones that want it censored.

German's picture

While I agree to some extent, I do feel that this person is doing many things wrong, Also I don´t think that there's nothing more to say on that subject that hasn't already been said. Just look at history with WW 2 and Vietnam just to mention some examples. These two are still being debated in universities around the world, just saying that there is no more to be said make me feel that we turn our back on the issue and maybe are bound to repeat the same actions that lead to the event in question.

On the issue of having it censured I have to agree but based on this "artist" using a game, an IP that doesn't belong to him and using it on such a controversial topic. Taito doesn't deserve this kind of bad publicity associated with their game. You want to be controversial or create "a social tale that can be related to historical tales without losing its poetic power" like he called it, that's just fine by me but an artist is supposed to be someone creative so use that creativity and don´t take other people work with out their knowledge and permission.