Sony will detail the terms of its full restructuring plan this week, as the global enterprise prepares to cut 16,000 staff in a bid to save the company an annual $1.1 billion.
An official announcement will occur today or tomorrow, according to The Financial Times, which also claims that Sir Howard Stringer’s plans for staff reductions has found opposition from unnamed company executives.
Regardless of such opposition, Sony’s restructuring seems inevitable, as the company sits in challenging times for high-end consumer goods, while the high Yen continues to compromise Japan’s export trade. Sir Howard believes, according to the FT, that Sony should cut its manufacturing costs and rely more on sales of software.
“Sony’s not in a position to halt all domestic production but it has to do something that drastic,” said Mitsushige Akino, chief fund manager at Ichiyoshi Investment Management, speaking to Reuters.
“If it announces plans to move production overseas while keeping only planning and development functions in Japan, that would be a positive.”
It is not known, and unlikely, that Sony’s games division will be a direct part of the group’s full restructuring plans.
"cut 16,000 staff in a bid to save the company an annual $1.1 billion"
Each of those employees costs $62k? Crikey...
@Huw Jass
I haven't verified your math; but you need to consider what they lump into that cost savings. Each employee presumably gets health benefits, a desk, chair, computer (and computer maintenance), a telephone, makes phone calls, recieves assistance from the Help Desk, asks questions about benefits, goes to company picnics and all of these sorts of things.
So, don't assume that each employee on average was getting that kind of paycheck; they were just costing that much overall.
It's not really suprising. I mean, my company tries to tell me I make about $35k more than I actually do; but it's because they're bundling in their expenses. Most of which I don't benefit from. I like to consider it internal marketing. :)
"don't assume that each employee on average was getting that kind of paycheck"
Where did I say that?