Shouldn't this be protected as satire? The only thing that Taito can prosecute him for is trying to sell it. As for it being offencive, maybe its just because I'm Canadian, but this doesn't seem like a huge deal, more of a biting satire of American xenophobia and the inevitability of the events that conspired on that fateful day than. While it may still be too soon for this piece to be widely accepted, the flak that the artist has garnered is largely undeserved as he is simply exercising his first amendment rights. This is just over-reaction bulls***.